On 29 November 2023, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed amendments in an Exposure Draft to tackle challenges in financial reporting for instruments with both debt and equity aspects. These amendments primarily target IAS 32, seeking to clarify aspects such as the impact of relevant laws or regulations on financial instrument classification, the ‘fixed-for-fixed’ condition for derivatives settled in the issuer’s equity, and the classification of instruments with obligations to purchase own equity, among others.
Additionally, proposed changes to IFRS 7 aim to enhance disclosures on various aspects, including the nature and priority of claims, terms and conditions of financial instruments, potential dilution of ordinary shares, and reclassifications of financial liabilities and equity instruments. Amendments to IAS 1 mandate additional information about amounts attributable to ordinary shareholders in financial statements. General comments In general, the WSBI-ESBG welcomes the IASB’s efforts to address practical issues in financial reporting concerning IAS 32, aiming to clarify principles and provide application guidance for consistent implementation. However, we have concerns and suggestions for reconsideration, including the need for more clarification and examples regarding the impact of relevant laws or regulations on financial instrument classification. Additionally, we seek further guidance on topics such as the recognition of liabilities for obligations to redeem entity’s own equity and the calculation of total comprehensive income attributable to other owners of the parent. Effects of Relevant Laws or Regulations WSBI-ESBG acknowledges the necessity of considering both contractual terms and legal regulations for understanding financial instruments.
However, we express concerns regarding practical challenges and unintended consequences, suggesting further clarification and field-testing. We also emphasize the need for guidance on assessing the impact of IASB proposals on various instruments, particularly puttable instruments and compound instruments. Settlement in an Entity’s Own Equity Instruments The lack of guidance on the fixed-for-fixed condition in IAS 32 has led to diverse interpretations. While the proposed amendments provide clarity on this aspect, WSBI-ESBG seeks further clarification, especially regarding convertible loans with variable interest rates. We also suggest complementing proposed requirements with a reasonability test for passage-of-time adjustments. Obligations to Purchase an Entity’s Own Equity Instruments While the clarification in the ED is helpful, WSBI-ESBG raises concerns about recognizing liabilities for obligations to redeem entity’s own equity, particularly regarding non-controlling interests. We suggest recognizing such liabilities as a separate component of non-controlling interests and offer insights into alternative approaches for remeasurement of financial liabilities.
Contingent Settlement Provisions WSBI-ESBG finds the proposed clarifications in the ED helpful for initial recognition and measurement of financial instruments with contingent settlement provisions. However, we emphasize the need for further clarity, especially concerning the accounting treatment for instruments where the obligation amount exceeds the consideration received. Shareholder Discretion While WSBI-ESBG generally supports the proposed requirements regarding shareholder discretion, it notes diversity in practice regarding treating shareholder decisions as entity decisions.
We stress the importance of considering specific circumstances and suggest factors for entities to assess when determining whether shareholder decisions are treated as entity decisions. Disclosure WSBI-ESBG acknowledges the significance of increased disclosure requirements but stresses the importance of clarity and practicality. We raise concerns about the usefulness of certain disclosures, particularly regarding priority on liquidation for financial institutions, and suggest cross-referencing to existing regulatory documents.
related
European Banking Authority (EBA) on ESG risk management
The European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) submitted its response to the consultation launched by the European Banking Authority (EBA). ESBG insists on the need for consitency with CSRD and CSDDD, the addressees of this guideline should also
Enhancing Transparency in Bank Disclosures: ESBG delivers comprehensive response to the EBA’s Pillar 3 data hub consultation
On 14 December 2023, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a discussion paper on the Pillar 3 data hub processes and its possible practical implications.
ESBG’s response to the EFRAG Comment Letter on Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity
On 29 November 2023, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed amendments in an Exposure Draft to tackle
ESBG advocates for increased clarity and streamlining of supervisory reporting requirements
On 14 March, ESBG submitted its response to the European Banking Authority (EBA) consultation on ITS amending Commission Implementation Regulation (EU) 2021/451 regarding supervisory reporting
WSBI-ESBG advocates for robust implementation of the BCBS Pillar 3 framework for climate-related financial risks
On 14 March, WSBI-ESBG submitted its response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on its Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks
ESBG stresses the need for consistency and clarity in its Response to the SFDR Review Consultation
ESBG submitted its response to the European Commission’s consultation on the SFDR review, aiming to enhance transparency in sustainability-related disclosures within the financial services sector
ESBG response to the EBA’s consultation on Guidelines on preventing the abuse of funds and certain crypto-assets transfers for ML/TF
The guidelines on the “travel rule” delineate the actions that Payment Service Providers (PSPs), Intermediary PSPs
ESBG responds to the SRB consultation on the future MREL policy
The European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) submitted its response to the consultation launched by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in December 2023 on the future of the Minimum Requirement for own funds
ESBG’s response to the Commission’s consultation on the GDPR
The primary EU legislation ensuring the fundamental right to data protection is the General Data Protection Regulation
Joint statement calling for clear distinction between AI and credit scoring in AI Act
On 11 January 2024, a joint industry statement was issued by ESBG, together with the Association of Consumer Credit Information Suppliers (ACCIS)