Positions
Latest position papers published by WSBI and ESBG. Responses to consultations and letters submitted to the European Commission and other policymaking bodies appear in many of the published papers.
ESBG stresses the need for consistency and clarity in its Response to the SFDR Review Consultation
On 14 December, ESBG submitted its feedback on the Sustainable Finance Disclosure
ESBG Advocates Clarity and Harmony in EU Taxonomy Implementation
ESBG remains committed to ensuring a clear and effective regulatory framework.
ESBG’s position paper on the potential inclusion of SMEs in the Taxonomy
In November 2023, ESBG published a position paper on the potential inclusion of
ESBG response to the EBA consultation on draft templates and template guidance for collecting climate related data from EU banks.
ESBG welcomes the opportunity to answer to the EBA’s consultation on the draft templates for collecting
ESBG sends a letter to the EBA and EC to address the proposed changes to the EBA RTS on IRRBB SOT
On 24 April, ESBG sent a letter to the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Commission (EC) regarding the EC proposed
Crypto-asset Activities: WSBI-ESBG calls for a more consistent regulatory approach
The said framework sets out a) the key issues and challenges in developing a comprehensive
WSBI-ESGB members call for aligned approach between regulatory bodies on Cyber incident reporting
On 17 October 2022, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a consultative document
Call for clarification on the Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive
The European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) response to the EU Commission’s call for feedback on the proposed Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive.
Call for clear scope of applicability of the Cyber Resilience Act
The European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) submitted its input to the European Commission’s call for feedback on the proposed Cyber Resilience Act, which was published in September. All feedback received will be summarised by the Commission and presented to the European Parliament and Council with the aim of feeding into the legislative debate. ESBG welcomed the proposal but warned that it leaves too much room for interpretation regarding its scope of applicability and that there are vertical initiatives that already regulate the cyber-resilience of hardware and software products used by certain sectors.
